Scored before it runs

Every task is scored for what it could break.

Before a task runs, Clawvisor estimates its blast radius: how much damage it could do if it went wrong or was hijacked. Reading a calendar scores low and flows straight through. Deleting a production table scores high and waits for a human. Risk becomes a number you can gate on, not a gut feeling.
Blast radius scored

Send the incident notice to everyone on the outage list.

comms-agentexpires when task completes
Tools requested1
  • google.gmail · send_message

    487 recipients

    write
high risk

The problem with treating every action the same

A flat approval flow can't tell the difference between an agent drafting a reply and an agent wiring money or dropping a database. So teams pick one extreme: review everything and grind to a halt, or review nothing and pray. The signal that should drive the decision, how irreversible and far-reaching the action is, never gets measured, so it never gets used.

How risk assessment works

01

Blast-radius scoring

Each task is scored on reversibility, scope, and sensitivity of the tools it requests, surfaced as a low / medium / high pill on the approval.

02

Risk-based gating

Set thresholds: auto-approve low risk, require a human above a line, hard-block the truly dangerous.

03

Context-aware

The same tool scores differently by scope: github · list_issues on one repo is not github · create_issue across the org.

04

Tuned to your tolerance

Adjust where the lines sit per team or environment, so staging moves fast and production stays careful.

Let your agents act. Safely.

Connect your accounts and put a gatekeeper in front of your agents in minutes. Free to start, no credit card.